As the means of use become more and more affordable — and ubiquitous — it becomes easier and easier for law enforcement agencies to use GPS devices. Once the realm of elite military fire teams and James Bond fiction, GPS systems can be purchased at your local best Buy or Radio Shack. This means more and more agencies can afford to plant them on unknowing suspects. How many law enforcement agencies are using these? No one knows — and the police aren’t talking.

It is apparent that these device do indeed work. In countless cases, across the United States, criminals have essentially — and literally — led the police to the scene of the crime. Washington State police tracked a father who was under suspicion for killing his nine-year-old daughter back to the location where he buried her body. Drug dealers in Los Angeles were tracked back to their supplier, which revealed an entire network of methamphetamine suppliers and dealers stretching all the way to the Mexican border.

The point civil liberties advocates stress has nothing to do with the effectiveness of GPS tracking devices. The technology works, and works well. The issue is with it’s constitutionality. Pundits claim using a GPS device should require the issuance of a warrant. They claim it is an act on par with searching a person’s home or business. To date, however, the courts have not agreed.

Despite the constitutional issues, judiciaries seem to be erring on the side of law enforcement. When a case can be made for using this technology to track terrorism suspects, it seems unlikely that most Americans will be up in arms about being tracked. Though there is compelling evidence that this kind of surveillance is tantamount to a breech of privacy, most Americans will enjoy the thought of sleep through the night with the proverbial eye in the sky watching for their safety.

The viability of GPS tracking devices makes them effective and accurate law enforcement tools. That said, there is an issue with regard to how constitutional a tool they actually are. Decide for yourself and weigh in on the argument.

Ancient Babylon used fingerprints for their unique identifying characteristics on clay tablets that recorded business transactions. However, modern forensic science did not begin to appropriate this valuable tool until 1888 when the Englishman, Sir Francis Galton, unveiled his fingerprint classification system in his book, “Fingerprints”. According to Galton’s calculations, there was only a chance of 1 in 64 billion for two people to share identical prints.

As forensic techniques became known, criminals did their best to outwit them. Gloves became standard wear in premeditated crimes. As glove materials evolved, so did the criminals’ choices. Currently, latex gloves, with their second-skin fit, are often found discarded at the border of a crime scene.

Ironically, it is more than possible to obtain fingerprints from the used latex gloves. The donning and stripping off of the gloves often leaves detectable thumb and opposing finger prints. The interior of the gloves may be turned inside out to find a reasonable print left inside the discarded gloves. The favored fit and tactile superiority of the latex glove can even go so far as to leave an oily fingerprint on a scene’s surface if the glove first contacted oil of any kind. The perpetrator may unwittingly touch their neck or face, leaving a thin film of oil on their gloves which will in turn betray them.

The criminal’s notion of gloves minimizing detection may shortly receive another blow from the advent of a new tool in the forensic detective’s arsenal. Bacteria collecting will soon be done in tandem with dusting for fingerprints. Individual humans harbor unique bacteria colonies that can be used to effectively sort out suspects. Only 13% of these identifying microbe blends are ever shared between any two individuals.

About 150 bacteria species are present on a person’s hand and can trail to fabrics and other materials at a crime scene. It is possible to successfully trace this personalized bacteria 12 hours or more after it has been deposited on surfaces. According to a recent Associated Press report, this developing forensic tool is so cutting edge that this type of scientific analysis was not possible even two years ago.

It is possible that surgical scrub techniques may extend into the criminal world with this breaking news. But it would be hard to believe that any “dirty rat” who has depended on latex gloves up until now despite the shortcomings, could successfully avoid slipping up with his newfound bacterial signature.

Jen lives in South Carolina where she is an experienced glove user and Director of Support for Glove Nation, an online discounter specializing in Disposable Gloves and Supplies, where she runs an info center assisting with glove use, Everything About Latex.

The emergence of alternative search engines has made the search for people on Google even more targeted. You no longer have to search Google’s massive database. You can go directly to a people search engine to find someone’s information.

The fact that you can no longer block your telephone number also plays a big role. The alternative to block your handset number is still accessible but now the other person has the right to reject any person that hides their handset number.

The new alternative search engines has changed the way people approach using the telephone. Crank callers especially have to take notice because anyone can retrieve valuable information as to who is behind the constant harassing phone calls. I guess the new ways to Google for people information online has definitely got rid of some of the nonsense of the past.

The capability to trace someone’s telephone number does not have to be limited only to preventing crank callers. There are many other options where you can discover lost love interest, relatives or old friends from college.

There also no limits to the database when it comes to doing a people search. You can search for people in your state or even nationwide. You will have privileges previously available only to top goverment officials.

The fee for such services is generally under fifty dollars for a year membership. The annual membership fee will give you the power to search for unlimited people for an entire calendar year.

It does not matter what the reasons are for your interest in using an alternative search engine to perform a people search. Whether it is to locate friends or deter stalkers, the availability of the valued information is definitely a convenience.

If you are looking to find address of old friends, then you should first visit address search. Click here to get your own unique version of this article with free reprint rights.